Enciclopedia Boulder v1.0

Inicio · Capítulos · 17. Referencias

18.44 17.2.20 Referencias metodológicas

ID Autor/organización Año Título URL
P56-R1 GRADE Working Group 2026 Overview of the GRADE approach https://book.gradepro.org/guideline/overview-of-the-grade-approach
P56-R2 GRADE Working Group 2026 Indirectness https://book.gradepro.org/guideline/indirectness
P56-R3 Sterne et al. 2019 RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials https://www.riskofbias.info/welcome/rob-2-0-tool
P56-R4 Sterne et al. 2016 ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
P56-R5 Whiting et al. 2026 QUADAS-3: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic test accuracy studies https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-25-02104
P56-R6 Moons et al. 2025 PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082505
P56-R7 Collins et al. 2024 TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378
P56-R8 Bossuyt et al. 2015 STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527
P56-R9 Page et al. 2021 The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
P56-R10 Rethlefsen et al. 2021 PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
P56-R11 Higgins et al. 2024 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions — Version 6.5 https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current
P56-R12 Shea et al. 2017 AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008
P56-R13 Page et al. 2023 ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076754
P56-R14 Wilkinson et al. 2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
P56-R15 Crossref 2026 Crossmark — current status, corrections, retractions and updates https://www.crossref.org/services/crossmark/
P56-R16 Crossref 2026 Crossmark — registering updates https://support.crossref.org/hc/en-us/articles/115000501246-Crossmark-registering-updates
P56-R17 AGREE Next Steps Consortium 2017 AGREE II: Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II https://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AGREE-II-Users-Manual-and-23-item-Instrument-2009-Update-2017.pdf
P55-R3 Crossref 2026 Crossref REST API documentation https://www.crossref.org/documentation/retrieve-metadata/rest-api/
P55-R4 DataCite Metadata Working Group 2026 DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data and Other Research Outputs — Version 4.7 https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.7/
P50-R4 W3C Provenance Working Group 2013 PROV-O: The PROV Ontology https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/