En esta página
16.40 15.2.18 Canonicalización y promoción
16.40.1 Reglas de canonicalización
- Component order, operator graph and functional invariants participate in composite identity.
- The same component concepts in a different order are not automatically the same composite.
- An optional or repeated component is represented by cardinality, not by cloning concept classes.
- Left/right or mirrored execution is a parameter unless a stable differential definition requires a separate concept.
- A textual arrow sequence remains an unparsed candidate until every component resolves to a canonical ID.
- A transition concept may bridge source and destination states without making either state a taxonomic parent.
- A composite template may be instantiated many times; each execution receives observation-level occurrence IDs.
- A named composite is promoted only after lexical, biomechanical, temporal and dataset review.
16.40.2 Criterios para promover una composición a concepto canónico
- Stable preferred term in at least one community or formal coaching context.
- Definition not reducible to arbitrary concatenation of its components.
- Reproducible temporal/contact invariants.
- Diagnostic criteria that separate it from adjacent compositions.
- Independent use in instruction, route setting, analysis or annotation.
- Evidence from multiple examples or expert adjudication.
- No collision with an existing canonical concept or parameterized variant.
OntoLex-Lemon permite representar entradas léxicas y expresiones multiword separadas del concepto ontológico. La existencia de un nombre compuesto no demuestra por sí misma que exista un concepto técnico independiente [P51-R5].